Monday 4 February 2013

Day Six - Project 1

Yeah, that's about right.

  My partner Mary has reminded me that if I am writing/riting/wrighting/righting my Bjournal, I should not complain about having to do it.  Like I had any say in the matter.  She just doesn't get me, y'know?

  Man, I hate when she's correct (too many uses of right, already).  So henceforth, I will put equal  effort into the regular posting, the furtherance of the 10 day ritual, the crafting of the Bjournal itself, and the fixing of problems.

  See what I did there?

  Homonyms are gnarly.

  I like Vitruvian Man.  Art does not speak to me, unless it is funny.  I have wept at plays and movies, and books will make me feel something powerful and profound (especially if they're funny), but visual mediums are just something I see.  In one of the upcoming projects, I'm going to try to go to a large number of museums in Nova Scotia in ten days (shooting for a minimum of ten, but who knows?), and I just sighed aloud in thinking about having to look at paintings.

  But like homonyms, Vitruvian Man is gnarly.  Also, like a homonym, one thing is performing a bunch of different possible functions.  Da Vinci apparently got this idea from Marcus Vitruvius, a Roman scholar in the field of architecture, who, in a fit of Roman calling-it-like-unus-sees-it, called his work De Architectura.  The human form can touch the line of a perfect square and circle.  From what I can comprehend, this can allow the human form to be the basis for proportion in the building of temples and other urban structures, which would be rather pointless without human forms in them in the first place.

  I like Vitruvian Man because of the history it drags along with it.  Vitruvius lived through the era of the Late Republic, Spartacus' slave revolt, Julius Caesar, and Augustus.  De Architectura was available to Leonardo Da Vinci and his mentor because of the mini-renaissance that sort of blossomed in Aachen under Charlemagne allowed it to be copied and survive the Dark Ages.  And it's just a cool sketch, when you get down to it, an intellectual exercise doodled by a genius thinking about mathematics and buildings and people and I guess everything about human existence.

  I like science when it's artistic.  And I like art when it's being scientific.

  Okay, the bjournal is available to my monoglot brethren elsewhere in the world, and the post is done.

  If I had a PhD, and I was creating an online journal as part of my thesis and research, would the document I uploaded be part of a post-doc doc-post?

  I bet that won't translate.

  -Mike

2 comments:

  1. I LOVE Vitruvian Mike! I also love "bjournal" even though it makes me think of Swedish bathroom fixtures (or maybe because of that?).

    I had to read/listen to a book about the creation of the Vitruvian Man sketch for my blog, as you know. I still have the audiobook if you'd care to listen to it. You may find it interesting.

    One of the things I learned is that the concept of the "divine proportion"--i.e. the measurements of man being exactly proportionate in predictable and mathematical ways--wasn't just a way map out architecure, so much as it was a way to prove that God was the architect of the universe and man was his greatest creation.

    Unfortunately, the divine proportion, or divine ratio, doesn't exactly work out, even in the drawing. Leonardo cheated a little with his sketch to make it work better.

    I'm excited about the museum project! I really like looking at paintings, but sometimes I glaze over at artifacts (that wasn't meant to be a pun on glazed pottery...wait, why would you even think it was?) so we can help each other.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, where'd you find the Google Translate gadget?! I want one! Ahhh the student has surpassed the master.

    ReplyDelete